BLAIR BITCH PROJECT...
TONY! TONY! TONY!
I just came back from seeing George W. Bush's "poodle", Tony Blair speak at the tent of the Sofitel Philippine Plaza, and surprisingly, I was rather charmed by the guy. Apparently, Tonyboy is in Manila for a series of talks and today the topic was: "The Leader as Principled Negotiator" . He spoke to about 500 or so business and diplomat types at the hotel's seaside tent. And after almost two hours of much anti-Gloria huffing and puffing by some Chief Justice something or another (Sorry, I ran out to have Hainanese Chicken Rice at Spiral and forgot to remember his name), Mr. B finally took the stage at about a quarter to four and spoke confidently, eloquently, and with a lot of self-deprecating humor. Naturally, there were more than a few measured catch phrases and jokes thrown at us, like:
On leadership: "In times of crisis, leaders stand up, they do not stand back"; On change: "If you try to change something for what you think is better, people hate you for it. And when you finally do, they think it's always been that way."On governance: "Campaign in poetry, govern in prose"; "Lead because you want to get it done"; "It is forgivable to fail, it is unforgivable not to try"; "Popularity is not the reason why one should lead." On problems: "If you can't fix it, manage it."; On the shift of world power to the east: "Change as the world changes". On sex and the premiership: "I was one of the first prime ministers in a long time to have a child born while in office, so it makes me wonder what the other Prime Ministers were doing all that time then." He also spoke about how he was treated after leaving office, about having his first cell phone, and about what it's like to be forgotten.
But when needled by Cheche Lazaro (above) about more pointed topics (pointed at GMA to be exact) such as popular mandate and religion, Blair, ever the diplomat, managed to charm his way out of a squeeze. He was given the very loaded question, "When do you think it's time for a leader to step down?", and managed to deflect the topic effortlessly while simultaneously eliciting laughter. Truly a polished politician.
But as the founder of the Tony Blair Faith Foundation and the chief negotiator of the North Ireland Good Friday Agreement, I was rather disappointed by his vague answers to inquiries about religion. And some answers were even a little bit too Judeo-Christian-centric for my taste. When asked if the resolution of war can be found in the Scriptures, "He replied 'yes', if you read it properly." He also kept mum about the topic of birth control and population management. In reference to Reproductive Health Bill 5043, Blair was asked: "Should a leader stand up to The Catholic Church should the need arise?" and he remained perfectly evasive, revealing nothing. But even though he remained mum about his side on the issue, judging by Cherie's confession about forgetting her "equipment" resulting in her being knocked up at Balmoral, I'll take his silence to mean, "yes".
But when needled by Cheche Lazaro (above) about more pointed topics (pointed at GMA to be exact) such as popular mandate and religion, Blair, ever the diplomat, managed to charm his way out of a squeeze. He was given the very loaded question, "When do you think it's time for a leader to step down?", and managed to deflect the topic effortlessly while simultaneously eliciting laughter. Truly a polished politician.
But as the founder of the Tony Blair Faith Foundation and the chief negotiator of the North Ireland Good Friday Agreement, I was rather disappointed by his vague answers to inquiries about religion. And some answers were even a little bit too Judeo-Christian-centric for my taste. When asked if the resolution of war can be found in the Scriptures, "He replied 'yes', if you read it properly." He also kept mum about the topic of birth control and population management. In reference to Reproductive Health Bill 5043, Blair was asked: "Should a leader stand up to The Catholic Church should the need arise?" and he remained perfectly evasive, revealing nothing. But even though he remained mum about his side on the issue, judging by Cherie's confession about forgetting her "equipment" resulting in her being knocked up at Balmoral, I'll take his silence to mean, "yes".Labels: interfaith, sofitel philippine plaza, tony blair


10 Comments:
He's always been a very good speaker.
With regards to religion, I'm not surprised that he evaded it and did not answer "should a leader stand up to the Catholic Church should the need arise?" given:
a) He converted INTO Catholicism, but he did it after leaving office because he strongly believed religion should not be infused into politics. Plus, one would think that a recent convert to Catholicism might be a bit more amenable to the Church
b) Religion is one of the main factors for the North Ireland conflict, and Catholicism is one side of it. Him giving a comment on it would violate point a, and would have ramifications in North Ireland, especially given the recent killings there
I would blow him a raspberry as well, for not speaking out about the church and birth control, but it's to be expected.
No politician worth his/her salt would come to a country as a visitor and be so undiplomatic as to stick their foot into whatever hot topic is percolating locally. It would have just been bad form.
I'm just curious, who paid for Mr. Blair's visit, pray tell? Could the $50,000.-$100,000. (+++?) have been more useful/productive if donated to worthwhile causes, like say, feeding the poor children of Metro-Manila?
I was standing 20 foot from Tony when he got the phone call...
"Right, they will pay me $xx,000 just to go there, wear some Varsity jacket, deliver a speech I have given 20 times, have lunch, go to another place, wear some varsity jacket, drop a few truisms during the open forum? And they don't really ask tough questions in that part of the world? Ok, I'll do it.."
And what about his ridiculous decision to join America's invasion of Iraq when the rest of the world was against it. Oh ya, I guess he did say that the bible said it was ok to kill thousands of innocent people.
In terms of who pays Blair, probably a fundraising/profit event by the organizers. They put up the cash upfront and raise cash/make money on ticket sales.
It is quite common for ex-US presidents (now UK PMs as well I guess) to make tons of money giving speaches after they leave office. Even W. Bush has a busy speaking schedule. You can be sure his first forum had right-leaning people that didn't ask "tough" questions (well, it was in Calgary).
I've watched other interviews that put Blair to task on Iraq, most notably The Daily Show (he he)... he does not hide behind anything and would give you a straight sincere answer on why he supported the Iraq invasion. I do have to say he has charisma and you can almost catch yourself buying in. The thing with Blair (as opposed to Cheney) is that he really believed in helping the people in the Middle East. Of course, the way he went about it was wrong, and there's a story in hubris buried there, but the intention (in my humble opinion) was good, unlike Cheney's.
I've personally heard Colin Powell speak (in an event where he was paid too)... for most of these speakers, they really enjoy giving these talks. Gives them a chance to remember the old days, make fun of a couple of things, and make some dough.
Tony Blurred...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Politicians all over the world are making a living in making public speeches etc. Especially in United States Bush,Clinton and other former politicians are making a lot of money. There is nothing wrong with that it's just ridiculous how much they get paid.
Like Senator Benigno Aquino jr. said when I was a politician for 25 yrs. We used to pay people to hear us but this is the first time people pay to hear me.
The world indeed.
Hi Carlos,
I thought you were really beside Tony Blair in the photo...At any rate, I'm sure you were the one with Bobby Chinn in one of the World Cafe Asia episodes. That episode is one of the nicest one of presenting the Philippines in the world, IMO.
I'm just curious of this comment -
"And what about his ridiculous decision to join America's invasion of Iraq when the rest of the world was against it. Oh ya, I guess he did say that the bible said it was ok to kill thousands of innocent people."
May I know what countries in the world that are against in the occupation of Iraq? And how many non-combatants there were killed by the Americans as compared with the terrorists who have been doing it intentionally?
Maybe the answer will be - if the Americans are not there, non-combatants will not be killed by the terrorists. The terrorists will bring the terrorism in America and the rest of the world.
Based on data, America has been safe since 9/11 up to today from terrorism acts. I don't know if Obama can sustain it.
Post a Comment
<< Home