The Blog and Tour Schedule of Carlos Celdran. A man who is trying to change the way you look at Manila - one step at a time. Telephone: (02)4844945 Text/Cell:(0920)9092021 or Email: celdrantours@hotmail.com

Friday, July 20, 2007

YO! YO! YO! CHECK IT OUT...

Wow. This one is cool. Log onto the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee's amazing collection of Manila pictures from the 1960s. Part of their "Cities of the World" feature and captured by a man named Harrison Forman, these pictures are an amazing account of what Manila was like one generation after World War II. They also show some very interesting details. For starters, who knew that Plaza Moraga at the foot of Jones Bridge had such great looking streetlamps (top, center). I wonder if Manila City Hall can have them copied?

It also shows that the Santa Cruz Church had no street vendors hanging outside in the plaza in the mid-1960s. I wonder when they - and the beggars - moved in. Incidentally, that tin street light hanging from the wires in the top center of the photograph is still there. Just saw it last week.

This photograph shows people wearing long sleeved shirts and slacks when going to work on the Escolta. Perhaps Manila was colder then? It also shows our city streets still packed with American cars. Not a TOYOTA in sight. I especially love the Studebaker on the left.

This photograph shows a very affluent Manila population going about their everyday business on the corner of Pinpin Street and Escolta. The kind of people who would probably never be caught dead there today. And most of the shops also seem so...American. Not to mention the fashions. We seem to have consumed a very conspicuous amount of American products and cultural norms right after the war.

This shot shows the El Hogar Building and Citibank still in use, complete with neon light billboards for Shell gasoline, Royal Tru Orange, and FGU Insurance. The Pasig River waterline looks much lower - and the water itself seems cleaner too. It's apparent from this shot that major multinational corporations in the Philippines still based their offices downtown and not clustered around the cramped Makati Business District in the mid-1960s. I wonder when exactly did the transition of Manila's business district from Manila to Makati happen. When did they abandon the streets of Juan Luna, Muelle de la Industria and Muelle del Banco and leave it to rot with the wandering vagrant classes? When did big business abandon downtown for Ayala Avenue?

Which, in this photograph, does not look cramped at all. And whatever happened to those pine trees on either side? It totally completes the illusion that this is a scene somewhere in the United States of America instead of the Philippine archipelago. Only thing lacking in this photograph are real Americans.

And check out this picture of a fabulously flowing, traffic-free, four-laned Roxas Boulevard. No coconut trees had been planted along the shoreline yet and the road had not been widened to eight lanes punctuated by overpasses. Most interesting of all, what is that being constructed in the distance? Is that the Cultural Center of the Philippines being built?

Other amazing shots to check out: Manila street scenes with painted jeepneys, a newly restored Manila Cathedral, and a wide open Agrifina Circle. Log on here.

Thanks Apa for the link.

Labels: ,

34 Comments:

Anonymous torn said...

Fantastic photos. I found the "Manila panoramic view" a bit confusing though. I couldn't figure out where it was shot from -- the top of the Holiday Inn (which was then the Hilton I think)?

7:08 PM  
Blogger carlosceldran said...

It was the Sheraton which became the Hyatt. So that must be the US Embassy Seafront Complex right beside it - without any tall fences...

7:11 PM  
Anonymous Jade186 said...

My parents and my grandma always said "noong araw, ang ganda at ang ayos ng Maynila".
This proves how right they were.
Thanks for posting these incredible photos!

7:31 PM  
Blogger kikomeister said...

it's so clean and bright. wala pang pollution

1:04 AM  
Blogger nerdluck said...

Wow... Manila of old was indeed magical. More please

3:27 PM  
Blogger john marzan said...

nice photos.

3:59 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Emerging Manila at the height of it's beauty and innocence.
Now, Modern Manila is a mix of wealth in the wrong places and poverty for the rest.

7:14 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hi Carlos! I'm amazed by the pictures. It makes me appreciate the past more. Kudos to you! I <3 Manila.

1:43 AM  
Blogger The Nashman said...

Damn, Manila WAS pretty.

But surely one can't blame Manilenyos for the sorry state of their city today. I'm sure ANYONE would want a Manila of yore with clean avenues and nice buildings.

Now it's totally different.

There's just too much Catholic-endorsed shagging going on that the city can't cope with the large population and the garbage and social problems that come with it

7:59 AM  
Anonymous Ed said...

Saw those photos when it was loaded in 2004 and was amazed. Good thing you discovered the site albeit late.

Haha...not that it was cold then. The reason why people are wearing long sleeves (or "semi-formal" attire) on Escolta during the late 1960s is that there is a city ordinance that since Escolta is the primary shopping and business district, people should wear a decent attire. Dapat may kwelyo.

Just an FYI sir. Hehe...still can't get over your observation that it was cold. Well maybe it is.

2:54 PM  
Blogger carlosceldran said...

That was a joke about the cold... :o)

4:39 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I looked at Bangkok from the same collection, and got the impression that the Philippines was just so far advanced.

6:18 PM  
Blogger Lalon said...

Wow! i'm speechless.. i didn't know Manila was this beautiful before?

and lookit' that Manila Bay, the water is in its clean blue hue, like it's supposed to.. not black.

11:54 PM  
Blogger carlosceldran said...

The thing I like most about this collection is that it sets the standard of what downtown Manila should feel like. And it shows it in great detail.

Look at the photo of Plaza Sta Cruz and the Santa Cruz Church. It can still look like that again today. All the structures in that photograph are still there today. All it needs is a little spit and shine and the return of the middle class.

5:55 AM  
Blogger christine said...

Wow, look at that blue bay!

8:26 AM  
Anonymous Vince said...

What makes you think that the people who're walking along Pinpin and Escolta Streets belonged to the affluent class? Besides, what's your definition of the adjective "affluent?" Let me remind you that the Philippines was already poverty-stricken even when the Americans arrived. There were already squatters during the American colonial period.

4:02 PM  
Blogger carlosceldran said...

Yes. Um. There were squatters. But not on the Escolta. Escolta was the poshest shopping street in Manila.

And I don't understand your point. You think the people above in the photograph in the starched clothes and Jackie O shades are the sweltering masses?

7:52 PM  
Blogger Antonio Sy said...

I just saw a photo on page 2 of the Wisconsin site and it shows what looks like Avenida. The building on the right of the photo still exists. Yikes!

12:55 PM  
Anonymous Vince said...

My point is that why are you portraying Escolta and other parts of Old Manila as if the city was a paradise before? Escolta was just a cosmetic facade where buildings were constructed by the American colonial administration to hide the reality of poverty in the city (there's an article "The Myth of 'Pistaym' Prosperity" written by historian Dr. Luis Dery that debunks all claims that the Philippines was a paradise during the American colonial period). Why don't you take your tourists to Tondo, particularly Baseco, Balut Island and Parola, and show them what reality is?

7:56 PM  
Blogger Urbano dela Cruz said...

yes, vince is right.

there were no, and there have never been, and there will never be any nice places in the city.

it's all been about squalor and slums and poverty and we have absolutely no hope of ever improving our cities or the lives of our countrymen.

/END SARCASM

7:09 AM  
Anonymous carlotta said...

these are very beautiful. if only the government was able to maintain these areas... too bad we have to look for their former glory under all those dirt and grime.

10:38 AM  
Blogger carlosceldran said...

Vince. Hello. Of course I know that.

Look. In any country there are rich and there are poor, squalid areas and nice areas. Im sure Peacetime wasn't any different (and those are not pictures from Peacetime. Those are from the 60s, by the way). Only thing that has changed from then and now is that there were much less walls (real ones) between areas of Manila. Plus the dividing line between the social classes was not as extreme as it is today.

Where once it was hidden, it seems Manikla can't even hide the squalor anymore. The poverty has become overwhelming. Our former nice (and historical) districts, such as the escolta above aren't even nice anymore and all that's left which can be called "paradise" are stored behind gated walls for the elite or in secured air conditioned malls.

Vince, please realize those photos above are of PUBLIC areas. Not private ones. Therein lies the difference between then and now. Comments like yours are proof that we have resigned ourselves to never aspiring for middle class values and to accept the fact that an ugly city is all we can be.

We have finally allowed poverty to define our identity.

Is that what you are trying to say? God. Please I hope not. Because I'm pretty sure you and I can get along on this topic.

3:56 PM  
Anonymous JOHANNA said...

As a matter of fact, Carlos does give a tour of Manilas squatters areas on his Chinatown tour. His tour is enlightening and he provides livelihood for kalesa drivers and gives the squatters powdered milk and birth control.

As a matter of fact, he does A LOT in showing what Manila is "all about". WHAT DO YOU DO, Vince? Go on his tour. it is obvious you have not. and research more about him before you give accusations.

Johanna

5:43 PM  
Anonymous katrina said...

As a matter of fact, Carlos, I think Manila *was* cooler back then. My mom tells me about how, when "sweater sets" were the fashion, they were an actual necessity for outdoor evening parties. Whereas, these days, if we learn that a party is going to be outdoors, we reach for the tank top. My mom's school uniform was close-necked, long-sleeved, with a skirt down to nearly her ankles; the fabric was thick and opaque, and they were required to wear a camisole underneath. Yet, she doesn't remember ever feeling too hot in it.

No wonder my parents are big believers in global warming.

2:35 AM  
Blogger Liza said...

Hi Mr.Celdran. I've been visiting your blog for quite sometime now, and I thoroughly enjoyed looking at this one. Thank you very much for sharing these photos. I will put them on my blog if you don't mind.

5:35 PM  
Anonymous twisted diva said...

Yep, Manila sure has changed. Sometimes, I think for the worse -- thanks to our lovely politicians -- but you know what? It's still home to me and I love it.

8:09 PM  
Blogger Bryanboy said...

OH MY GOD.

10:43 PM  
Anonymous alejandro said...

Yes Manila of the past was so beautiful (sigh), the happening place of Asia. We know this already. And the government can come up with plans and (renovate) imitate how those places were during the good old days. We see proof of this when shopping areas and buildings are looking like exact copies of cultural or historical sites. But we know this already as well. What I'm going to mention instead is no, it was not really one reason why Manila regressed due to overpopulation. Like the amount of people in the term overpopulation, there are many reasons. One is a problem the whole world faces and that is too many people all being based and cramped up in the cities for work. This is due to industrialization. This makes things look more overpopulated than it really is. The populations of countries are not fully distributed well. If more development spread out was taking place or if there was even more farming and agriculture going on with very high value near the outskirts of cities, then things would be more evened out. Another thing is lack of responsibility from those in power. They did not create or enforce the necessary laws in order to prevent things from happening or getting out of control. Walang disiplina is the cause and result. They did not anticipate or care of what the result would be. In Shanghai, they actually have a law that prohibits people who are not from Shanghai, from working there or seeking work there. This is a recent law they made because they have learned from the typical world city problems about this. In a number of European cities, they have zoning taking place which is where they have strict boundaries created at the outskirts of the city where development or disturbance is not allowed at all. Some of them are the ones with farms and wine industries just nearby the city. So what may seem lost, they gain anyways from these agricultural industries. That's why many of those European cities are so packed tightly and land is not wasted in the city and many people live in the core. So for a city, the right planning planning and planning is the key.

11:29 PM  
Anonymous alejandro said...

About the attire, it's common sense that in the past, people around the world and the fashion were more dressy. People would be wearing everyday polos and slacks, and for the women blouses, dresses and skirts. This was also the case for lower classes, which was also linked with how Carlos mentioned the wealth gap was not as severe then. Most people really wanted to look their best when going out for anything. And even during Spanish times, notice in pictures how the upper class levels and natives were wearing baro't sayas and chinos or things in that vein. That's been an irritating thing for me, how things and attire have just gotten too casual. I mean, you really want to go to a restaurant and have a sando-wearing during-a-hot-day person eating beside you with their kili-kili nakalabas?

11:39 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

So what do you think about Mayor Lim's creation of a Heritage commission?I think it's a welcome news.

IndioBravo

5:49 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

alejandro,

did you catch this?

indiobravo,

i think i'll wait and see

4:06 AM  
Blogger travelphilippines said...

i love old manila....

5:30 PM  
Anonymous tish said...

so my mom was ryt..she told me once that wlang sinabi ang maynila dati n ngaun..we were even greytr n more progressive than japan n china(tho i still thnk mas cleaner ang pinas than of china..well some parts of it..hee.!)..ngaun naglipaan na mga overpass kung saansaan..its not nice to see..but anyway..thanx for sharing the photos..greyt site!!i'll introduce my friends to your site...:)

2:32 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

i could not imagine how the manila looks before. very informative site. :D

5:15 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home